After-Action Reviews, graded with intention.
A purpose-built workspace where students submit reflective journals and instructors deliver rigorous, rubric-aligned feedback — paired with FYI-based leadership coaching tailored to every entry.
Four criteria, scored on evidence — Fidelity of Observation, Structural Deconstruction, Theoretical Synthesis, Behavioral Architecture.
Behaviors mapped to 67 competencies and 19 derailers, with coaching tagged REMEDY, STRETCH, or CALIBRATION.
Every grade is editable. Nothing reaches a student until the instructor releases it.
From journal entry to released feedback in three steps.
Submit
Students compose a reflective entry against an assignment. Submission is private and immediately enters the audit queue.
Audit
The system grades against the published rubric and surfaces matched competencies, stallers, and level-tagged coaching.
Release
Instructors review, refine, and release. Students see only what's been approved — never an unreviewed draft.